The competent authority shall properly inform the master of a ship referred to in paragraph 1 of the right of appeal.

Where there is no right of appeal to a court of law, or where such appeal may be only in respect of the legal validity of the decision, or where the appeal cannot have suspensory effect, a decision refusing renewal of a residence permit or ordering the expulsion of the holder of a residence permit from the territory shall not be taken by the administrative authority, save in cases of urgency, until an opinion has been obtained from a competent authority of the host country before which the person concerned enjoys such rights of defence and of assistance or representation as the domestic law of that country provides for.

Without prejudice to rights of appeal under national law, complaints regarding the application of Articles 7(2), 8, 8a, 10 and 14(1) to (4) and (6) shall be submitted to the coordination committee.

37.4 An appeal to the Competition Committee against a decision on the right of a competitor to participate in a competition can be made until the beginning of the competition.

Undertakings shall have the right to appeal against measures taken under this Article in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 4 of Directive 2002/21/EC (Framework Directive).

Any party who is the subject of a decision by a national regulatory authority should have the right to appeal to a body that is independent of the parties involved.

The owner or the operator of the ship or his representative in the Member State shall have a right of appeal against a detention decision taken by the competent authority.

Each institution shall lay down provisions conferring the right to lodge an appeal within the reporting procedure, which has to be exercised before lodging a complaint as referred to in Article 90(2).

Provisions should be adopted to ensure the right of appeal against the introduction of operating restrictions to an appeal body, which may be a court.

Furthermore, any undertaking which considers that its applications for the granting of rights to install facilities have not been dealt with in accordance with the principles set out in this Directive should be entitled to appeal against such decisions.

Each candidate or representative of a list of candidates shall have the right to lodge an appeal with the National Assembly against the decision of an electoral commission which could affect the confirmation of a deputy's term of office.

Furthermore, the MacBride commission report mentions, in addition to the right of correction, the right of reply, then the right of complaint against the 'refusal of communication', and also the American commission for federal communications, which deals with complaints about the unbalanced presentation of controversial public issues, etc. (Mnogo glasova, jedan svet/Many voices, one world, Jugounesco, Belgrade 1980)

Member States shall ensure the right to appeal against the measures taken pursuant to Article 6 and Article 7(b) before an appeal body other than the authority that has adopted the contested measure, in accordance with national legislation and procedures.

In addition to the rights of recourse granted under national or Community law, there is a need for a simple procedure to be initiated at the request of either party in a dispute, to resolve cross-border disputes which lie outside the competence of a single national regulatory authority.

If the right to benefits was acquired under the legislation administered by the latter institution, taking into account Article 57 (2) and (3) (a) and (b) of the Regulation, that institution shall pay advances up to an amount to be determined, where necessary, after consultation with the institution against whose decision the appeal was lodged.

Where undertakings find that their applications for rights to install facilities have not been dealt with in accordance with the principles set out in Directive 2002/21/EC (Framework Directive) or where such decisions are unduly delayed, they should have the right to appeal against decisions or delays in such decisions in accordance with that Directive.

This Article shall be without prejudice to the right of the parties to submit an appeal under Articles 57 and 63, or to the possibility, under the procedures and conditions laid down by the Implementing Regulation referred to in Article 157(1), of correcting any linguistic errors or errors of transcription and obvious errors in the Office's decisions or errors attributable to the Office in registering the trade mark or in publishing its registration.";

Those with longer memories will recall that when passing the law on the human rights ombudsman, deputies to the National Assembly made attempts to place a number of obstacles particularly with regard to the ombudsman's access to defense ministry sources, that is, the sector in which one could expect the greatest number of complaints because of the repressive nature of that body, similar to that of the police.

Member States shall ensure that effective mechanisms exist at national level under which any user or undertaking providing electronic communications networks and/or services who is affected by a decision of a national regulatory authority has the right of appeal against the decision to an appeal body that is independent of the parties involved.

Access to the file, which is one of the procedural safeguards designed to ensure effective exercise of the right to be heard (3) provided for in Article 19 (1) and (2) of Council Regulation No 17 (4) and Article 2 of Commission Regulation No 99/63/EEC (5), as well as in the corresponding provisions of the Regulations governing the application of Articles 85 and 86 in the field of transport, must be arranged in all cases involving decisions on infringements, decisions rejecting complaints, decisions imposing interim measures and decisions adopted on the basis of Article 15 (6) of Regulation No 17.

Slovene 'correction/ popravek' (elsewhere: reply/odgovor) is the reaction of an affected party to a published matter about him/ her (obviously it is a personal interest that is at work here), while the Slovene 'reply/odgovor' is a legal institute unknown elsewhere in the world especially not in the field of print media (where plurality of the media is expected to be guaranteed by market competition rather than by the legally prescribed rights of readers or the obligations of the media). As for electronic media, I have so far tracked down merely a few precepts vaguely resembling those; more precisely, the right of listeners to file a complaint with the corresponding authority against the biased, false or deficient presentation of facts or opinions.

With a view to protecting clients and without prejudice to the right of customers to bring their action before the courts, it is appropriate that Member States encourage public or private bodies established with a view to settling disputes out-of-court, to cooperate in resolving cross-border disputes, taking into account Commission Recommendation 98/257/EC of 30 March 1998 on the principles applicable to the bodies responsible for out-of-court settlement of consumer disputes(15). When implementing provisions on complaints and redress procedures for out-of-court settlements, Member States should be encouraged to use existing cross-border cooperation mechanisms, notably the Financial Services Complaints Network (FIN-Net).

Every such measure shall be subject to the right to apply to the courts in the Member State in which the authorities adopted it.

Every such measure shall be subject to a right of appeal to the courts in the Member State the authorities of which adopted it.

a prior hearing and right of appeal by the operator concerned in respect of the measures referred to in Article 3 (1) (c) and, where appropriate, (b);

Parties to the appeal proceedings shall be entitled to make oral representations.

The holder shall have the right to appeal the BTI.

It is therefore necessary to provide safeguards including a right of appeal to a Board of Appeal, and ultimately to the Court of Justice.

The complainant shall be entitled to see the Ombudsman's file on his or her complaint, subject to Article 13.3 below.

Each Member State shall make provision for the right to apply to the courts in respect of a refusal to issue the certificate referred to in paragraph 1 (a) or (b).

Rights of appeal existing under the laws in force in the Member States against decisions by the competent authorities shall not be affected by this Directive.

Each Member State shall make provision for the right to apply to the courts in respect of a refusal of authorization or refusal to issue the certificate referred to in paragraph 1 (a) or (b).

whereas it should consequently be provided that the parties concerned waive in advance their right to lodge any complaint in respect of the quality and characteristics of the product which may be assigned to them;

Each institution shall lay down provisions conferring the right to lodge an appeal within the reporting procedure, which has to be exercised before lodging a complaint as referred to in Article 90(2).

Rights of appeal existing under current legislation in the Member States against decisions taken pursuant to this Directive by the competent authorities shall not be affected by this Directive.

Except in cases provided for in the fourth subparagraph, rights of appeal existing under the laws in force in the Member States against decisions by the competent authorities shall not be affected by this Directive.

Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that any natural or legal person affected by the control has a right of appeal against the measures taken by the competent authority following the control.

Member States shall ensure that decisions taken in respect of an institution under laws, regulations and administrative provisions adopted in accordance with this Directive are subject to the right to apply to the courts.

- provide effective, non-discriminatory and prompt procedures enabling the right of appeal against customs and other agency administrative actions, ruling and decisions affecting import or export of goods,

provide effective, non-discriminatory and prompt procedures enabling the right of appeal against customs and other agency administrative actions, ruling and decisions affecting import or export of goods,

(5) Appropriate provisions should therefore be included in Regulation (EC) No 2695/94 to make Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 applicable to the Translation Centre for the bodies of the European Union, as should a provision on a right of appeal against a refusal of access to documents.

'A statement of the circumstances establishing the right to intervene, where the application is submitted pursuant to the second or third paragraph of Article 37 of the EC Statute, Article 34 of the ECSC Statute or the second paragraph of Article 38 of the Euratom Statute.'

a statement of the circumstances establishing the right to intervene, where the application is submitted pursuant to the second or third paragraph of Article 37 of the EC Statute, Article 34 of the ECSC Statute or the second paragraph of Article 38 of the Euratom Statute.';

(h) provide effective and prompt procedures enabling the right of appeal, against customs and other agency administrative actions, rulings and decisions affecting import or export of goods, in conformity with Article X of the GATT 1994; and

Penalties not paid may lead to temporary seizure of the vessel concerned or any other vessel belonging to the same shipowner as a warranty for payment and to confiscation of the vessel without prejudice to the right of the shipowner to appeal to the relevant court.

It follows that, where European employees make complaints about violations of their data protection rights and are not satisfied with the results of internal review, complaint, and appeal procedures (or any applicable grievance procedures under a contract with a trade union), they should be directed to the state or national data protection or labor authority in the jurisdiction where the employee works.

When the Ombudsman, because of legal proceedings in progress or concluded concerning the facts which have been put forward, has to declare a complaint inadmissible or terminate consideration of it, the outcome of any enquiries he has carried out up to that point shall be filed definitively.

If the consignor or his representative so requests, the said decisions and reasons shall be forwarded to him in writing with details of the rights of appeal which are available to him under the law in force in the Member State of destination and of the procedure and time limits applicable.

If the Commission discovers irregularities, mismanagement or fraud in relation to a grant, either by audits or on-the-spot checks, the beneficiary shall be subject to one or several of the following administrative measures and penalties in proportion to the severity of the case (and with a right to appeal against the decision):

It has been claimed that one of the complainant Community producers should not have been taken into account for the purpose of determining the representativity of the applicants since this company allegedly lost its right to produce the product concerned for reasons of intellectual property rights.