By issuing the present notice, the Commission is taking steps to bring transparency and to facilitate investment decisions of all postal operators, in the interest of the users of postal services in the European Union.

(7) As regards assemblers' requests for exemption by the Commission, clear provisions should be laid down regarding the admissibility of requests, the conduct of examinations, the taking of decisions, review and revocation of exemptions.

A notified body which refuses to issue or withdraws an EC type-examination certificate must inform the Member State which notified it and the other notified bodies accordingly, giving the reasons for its decision.

The Member State shall immediately inform the Commission and the other Member States of actions taken under this Article and give reasons for its decision, supplying its review of the environmental risk assessment, indicating whether and how the conditions of the consent should be amended or the consent should be terminated, and, where appropriate, the new or additional information on which its decision is based.

A decision may be taken, under the procedure laid down in Article 24(2), to change the BSE classification of a Member State or third country, or of one of its regions, in accordance with the results of the checks provided for in Article 21.

The Commission will take into account the observations made by Member States, in particular those concerning the results of their import controls and will inform the Member State concerned of the action proposed in the light of these observations before the adoption of any decision.

Whereas it is the Commission's responsibility to adopt decisions in respect of third countries for animal health conditions and public health and, to this end, the Commission should be in a position to make on-the-spot checks in accordance with Article 5 of Directive 72/462/EEC;

In accordance with paragraph 3 of UNSCR 1390(2002), the above measures will be reviewed by the UN Security Council 12 months after adoption of the resolution and at the end of this period the Security Council will either allow the measures to continue or decide to improve them.

In cases where Articles 4, 5 and 6 are applied prior to the start of operation by a ro-ro ferry or high-speed passenger craft on a regular service, a decision to prevent a ship operating must be taken within one month of the initial specific survey and communicated to the company immediately.

A decision may be taken in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 24(2) to adapt Decision 2000/766/EC to the situation of each Member State in the light of the results of Commission inspections and the incidence of BSE, based on the results of BSE monitoring, with particular reference to testing of bovine animals, as established by Annex III.

Where a check carried out by the competent authorities of the Member States in accordance with Article 20(2) reveals that the conditions required for the recognition of a producer organisation have not been met, the said authority shall take a temporary decision within a time period not exceeding one month.

As a reference, the GSC Security Office will circulate a table to all the Member States and where appropriate, EU decentralised agencies concerned summarising the nature and classification of the information and listing the organisations and countries to which it may be released, as decided by the Council.

(2) At the basis of that decision were findings made in Serbia and Montenegro according to which the system of certification and control of the preferential origin of sugar of CN codes 1701 and 1702 did not allow the competent authorities of this beneficiary country to verify the originating status of the products and to provide administrative cooperation as required for the verification of evidence of origin.

It also needs to be noted that the amount foreseen to be spent on Hynix bonds from the start was considerable in comparison to Hynix's turnover; KRW 2,9 trillion was more than 70 % of the Hynix 2001 turnover. (77) That Hynix was not going to be able to repay this new financing became evident during the course of the programme, as its position was reviewed monthly in the context of decisions by the banks on which bonds should be purchased each month.

The Member State of the competent authority receiving applications shall examine them, in particular as to quantity, economic implications of the planned exports and the practicality of execution and, where it finds them admissible, shall notify the Commission, which shall take a decision in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 23 of Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 or Article 27 of Regulation (EEC) No 1418/76. Where the Commission accepts an application, it shall in particular set a time limit for presentation of the contract to the competent authority.

This decision may be subject to an appeal or a review.

The notification must contain the conclusion of the examination and the reasoned assessment decision.

The notification must include the conclusions of the examination and the reasoned assessment decision.

However, the decision regarding type approval will not be taken until all samples have been fully examined.

The notification must contain the conlusions of the examination and the duly substantiated assessment decision.

This decision shall be immediately reviewed in the Standing Veterinary Committee in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 16.'

any review of national decisions regarding an intentional transboundary movement, in accordance with Article 12 of the Protocol;

The notification to the manufacturer shall contain the conclusions of the examination and, in the event of refusal, the justification for the decision.

any review of decisions at Community level regarding an intentional transboundary movement, in accordance with Article 12 of the Protocol;

In these circumstances, in order that the examination and selection of the programmes can be completed, the deadline for the Commission decision should be prolonged until 15 November 2002.

This decision shall be reviewed every eight years on the basis of information to be provided to the Commission by the Member States concerned in accordance with the procedure set out in Article 9.

IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SAME PROCEDURE , A DECISION MAY BE TAKEN TO EXTEND THE EXAMINATIONS TO SUBSTANCES OTHER THAN THOSE REFERRED TO IN THE SECOND SUBPARAGRAPH OF PARAGRAPH 1 (B).

Any member shall be entitled, at least one month before the date of the general meeting required to decide on the merger, to inspect at the registered office the following documents:

having examined the concerns and opinions expressed by the public concerned, the reasons and considerations on which the decision is based, including information on the public participation process.";

The Member State carrying out the inspection shall take a decision, with the consent of the flag State, on whether the inspector remains on board during the re-routing of the vessel.

having examined the concerns and opinions expressed by the public concerned, the main reasons and considerations on which the decision is based, including information about the public participation process,

Indeed, this could provide the necessary transparency on tariff calculations and facilitate users' decisions about traffic flow or the location of headquarters or premises.

Any decision taken pursuant to paragraphs 1 to 3 shall be submitted to the next meeting of the College for review, and where appropriate endorsement, amendment or revocation.

Under these circumstances, in order to permit the examination and selection of programmes to be completed, the deadline for the Commission decision should be postponed until 20 November for this first year.

The EC Commission and the EFTA Surveillance Authority shall arrange joint inspection visits to establish a common recommendation for the purposes of the decisions to which reference is made in paragraph 5(b), second indent.

Appeal or review concerning this decision shall not suspend the implementation of the transfer except when the courts or competent bodies so decide in a case-by-case basis if the national legislation allows for this.

Within six months of the date on which it receives the information from the Member State, the Commission shall examine the measures envisaged and, in accordance with the procedure set out in Article 9, take a decision which it shall communicate to the Member States.

As regards assemblers' requests for exemption by the Commission, clear provisions should be laid down regarding the admissibility of requests, the conduct of examinations, the taking of decisions, review and revocation of exemptions.

It is recommended that patients should be evaluated at least every second year in the 4-year period after initiation of treatment with Rebif and a decision for longer term treatment should then be made on an individual basis by the treating physician.

When looking at competition problems in this sector, it is important to bear in mind existing case law and Commission decisional practice on, for example, leveraging market power, discrimination and bundling.

That Hynix was not going to be able to repay this new financing became evident during the course of the programme, as its position was reviewed monthly in the context of decisions by the banks on which bonds should be purchased each month.

Where there is a request to change the plan, the competent authority shall take a decision after examining in detail the supporting documents provided and in the light of the criteria laid down in the second subparagraph of paragraph 2, and in accordance with the procedure set out in this paragraph.

In accordance with general principles of Community law, and in particular the right to a fair hearing, decisions of a supervisory authority should in appropriate circumstances be susceptible to review by an independent court or tribunal.

However, in exceptional cases, if a Member State is unable, for reasons relating to public health, to accept the conclusions reached following an inspection under Article 111(1), that Member State shall forthwith inform the Commission and the Agency.

The persons referred to in Article 12(1) shall have access to a court or other independent and impartial public body competent to review the procedural and substantive legality of the decisions, acts or failure to act of the competent authority under this Directive.

This Board should be entrusted with the necessary powers to establish the budget, verify its execution, adopt the appropriate financial rules, establish transparent working procedures for decision making by the Agency and appoint the Executive Director.

Should it emerge from these inspections and/or audits or from the checks provided for in Directives 90/675/EEC and 91/496/EEC that third-country certifying officers have not complied with these principles, additional guarantees or specific requirements may be decided on in accordance with the procedure provided for in Article 7 of this Directive.

ACTING UNANIMOUSLY ON A COMMISSION PROPOSAL ACCOMPANIED BY A REPORT DRAWN UP AFTER CONSULTATION WITH MEDICAL AND VETERINARY EXPERTS FROM ALL THE MEMBER STATES , THE COUNCIL SHALL DECIDE WHETHER OR NOT A SYSTEMATIC EXAMINATION FOR TRICHINOSIS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FIRST PARAGRAPH IS NECESSARY.

If, after considering the reports, the Member State receiving the reports considers that it cannot accept the conclusions reached by the competent authorities of the Member State in which the report was established, it shall inform the competent authorities concerned of its reasons and may request further information.

The competent authority shall take its decision in respect of those requests after having carried out an on-the-spot inspection of the various aspects referred to in the second subparagraph of paragraph 2 and of the progress made in implementing the plan, as well as of all supporting documents in relation to the request to change the plan.