For the purposes of this Convention, the term »resident of a Contracting State« means any person who, under the laws of that State, is liable to tax therein by reason of his domicile, residence, place of management or any other criterion of a similar nature, and also includes that State, any political subdivision or local authority thereof.

c) the term “Slovenia” means the Republic of Slovenia and, when used in a geographical sense, the territory of Slovenia including the sea area, sea-bed and sub-soil adjacent to the territorial sea, over which Slovenia may exercise its sovereign rights and jurisdiction in accordance with its domestic legislation and international law;

(ii) with respect to the level of support actually provided during any year of the implementation period and thereafter (i.e. the "Current Total AMS"), calculated in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement, including Article 6, and with the constituent data and methodology used in the tables of supporting material incorporated by reference in Part IV of the Member's Schedule;

Should the court establish during the course of proceedings, that the dispute does not fall under the jurisdiction of courts of the Republic of Slovenia, it shall declare the lack of jurisdiction, set aside the executed procedural acts and reject the action, save in cases when the jurisdiction of courts of the Republic of Slovenia depends on the defendant's consent and the same is granted.

b) the term »the Netherlands« means the part of the Kingdom of the Netherlands that is situated in Europe, including its territorial sea, and any area beyond the territorial sea within which the Netherlands, in accordance with international law, exercises jurisdiction or sovereign rights with respect to the sea bed, its sub soil and its superjacent waters, and their natural resources;

The "non bis in idem" rule applies in Union law (see, among the many precedents, the judgment of 5 May 1966, Cases 18/65 and 35/65, Gutmann v. Commission [1966] ECR 103 and a recent case, the decision of the Court of First Instance of 20 April 1999, Joined Cases T-305/94 and others, Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV v. Commission [1999] ECR II-931).

If the laboratory has reported the presence of a T/E ratio greater than four (4) to one (1) in the urine, further investigation is obligatory in order to determine whether the ratio is due to a physiological or pathological condition, except if the laboratory reports an Adverse Analytical Finding based on any reliable analytical method, showing that the Prohibited Substance is of exogenous origin.

The observation of 9 paralytic poliomyelitis cases in Slovenia 1978, and 66 cases in Albania, together with a small number of paralytic patients in Germany, the Netherlands, Canada and some Euro-Asian regions, where the disease had been absent for decades of years, clearly indicates the need for a strategy to eliminate apparent infections.

The purpose of the present study was to visualize the water penetration into RM GIC samples prepared in two different setting modes as a function of time using MR microimaging. In addition we wanted to answer the questions if the flexural strenght of the cement is impaired when the photopolymerization is excluded.

The wording for that right in the first two paragraphs results from the case law (Court of Justice judgment of 15 October 1987 in Case 222/86 Heylens [1987] ECR 4097, paragraph 15 of the grounds, judgment of 18 October 1989 in Case 374/87 Orkem [1989] ECR 3283, judgment of 21 November 1991 in Case C-269/90 TU München [1991] ECR I-5469, and Court of First Instance judgments of 6 December 1994 in Case T-450/93 Lisrestal [1994] ECR II-1177, 18 September 1995 in Case T-167/94 Nölle [1995] ECR II-258) and the wording regarding the obligation to give reasons comes from Article 253 of the EC Treaty, now replaced by Article I-38(2) of the Constitution (cf. also the legal base in Article III-398 of the Constitution for the adoption of legislation in the interest of an open, efficient and independent European administration).

The term »dividends« as used in this Article means income from shares, »jouissance« shares or »jouissance« rights, mining shares, founders' shares or other rights, not being debt claims, participating in profits, as well as income from other corporate rights which is subjected to the same taxation treatment as income from shares by the laws of the State of which the company making the distribution is a resident.

How to satisfy a very demanding service consumer i.e. the patient, accustomed to a relatively high level of health safety, so that he actually gets what he wants, what the profession prescribes, and when he wants it, at a time when all the engaged in the assurance of health care (providers, consumers, finances providers, goverment) have their own aims, interests and tasks and strive for an improvement of health protection?

The term »interest« as used in this Article means income from debt claims of every kind, whether or not secured by mortgage and whether or not carrying a right to participate in the debtor's profits, and in particular, income from government securities and income from bonds or debentures, including premiums and prizes attaching to such securities, bonds or debentures.

This is consistent both with case law of the Court of Justice (Cf. notably case law on the "precautionary principle" in Article 174 (2) TEC (replaced by Article III-233 of the Constitution): judgment of the CFI of 11 September 2002, T-13/99, Pfizer vs. Council, with numerous references to earlier case law; and a series of judgments on Article 33 (ex-39) on the principles of agricultural law, e.g. judgment of the Court of Justice C-265/85, Van den Berg, 1987 ECR 1155:

The term »royalties« as used in this Article means payments of any kind received as a consideration for the use of, or the right to use, any copyright of literary, artistic or scientific work including cinematograph films, any patent, trade mark, design or model, plan, secret formula or process, or for information concerning industrial, commercial or scientific experience.

The text of the Convention had been amended according to the provisions of Protocol No. 3 (ETS No. 45), which entered into force on 21 September 1970, of Protocol No. 5 (ETS No. 55), which entered into force on 20 December 1971 and of Protocol No. 8 (ETS No. 118), which entered into force on 1 January 1990, and comprised also the text of Protocol No. 2 (ETS No. 44) which, in accordance with Article 5, paragraph 3 thereof, had been an integral part of the Convention since its entry into force on 21 September 1970. All provisions which had been amended or added by these Protocols are replaced by Protocol No. 11 (ETS No. 155), as from the date of its entry into force on 1 November 1998. As from that date, Protocol No. 9 (ETS No. 140), which entered into force on 1 October 1994, is repealed.

[Fortissimo] T, T, T, T.

K/T boundary:

(30).From (25), considering t(x = 0) = 0 and (29) and (30), it follows that:

t Test:

(29).From the boundary condition w''(x = 0) = 0, because M(x = 0) = 0 (the bending moment at the free end of the column), it follows, considering t(x = 0) = 0:

26 FINISH [TR]

RUNS:

t = 23.8 şC

23 START [TR]

t = 23.8 ĹźC

Potato virus T

14 RUNS [TR]

22 TRAINING [TR]

44.4 THE COURSE [TR]

41.11 COURSE [TR]

41.9 PROGRAMME [TR]

44.3 ENTRIES [TR]

t= cycle time, s

From the boundary condition w' = C2 for x = 0 (the slope of the elastic curve at the free end of the column), it follows, consideringt(x = 0) =-b.1n(1 + 0) = 0 by (23):

32 CAPSIZE [TR]

41.2 PARTICIPATION [TR]

44.9 AWARDS [TR]

Authors' Address:

ACCEPTANCE OF ENTRIES [TR]

31 CLEARING THE COURSE [TR]

44.2 ORGANIZATION [TR]

T - Théâtre national

OFFICIALS [GR] [TR]

25 FALSE START [TR]

29 PENALTIES [TR]

35 DEAD HEAT/TIES [TR]

Reference solution T

MINIMUN PARTICIPATION [TR]

27 MARKING OF THE GATES [TR]