Subsequent to the imposition of the provisional anti-dumping duty, the Government of Hong Kong and other interested parties who so requested were granted an opportunity to be heard by the Commission.

Furthermore, the Commission may hear interested parties, provided that they make a request in writing and show that there are particular reasons why they should be heard.

Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limits set in the notice of initiation.

Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their,, views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set out in the Notice of Initiation.

Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limits set out in the Notice of initiation.

All parties who so requested within the set time limit and who indicated that there were particular reasons why they should be heard were granted the opportunity to be heard.

The Office, when hearing an application for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity shall, unless there are special grounds for continuing the hearing, of its own motion after hearing the parties or at the request of one of the parties and after hearing the other parties, stay the proceedings where the validity of the Community trade mark is already in issue on account of a counterclaim before a Community trade mark court.

The arbitration award shall be made as soon as possible after the hearing or receipt of evidence of the material which the parties wish to put before the tribunal.

All parties who so requested within the time limit set above and who demonstrated that there were particular reasons why they should be heard were granted the opportunity to be heard.

All parties who so requested within the said time limit and who demonstrated that there were particular reasons why they should be heard were granted the opportunity to be heard.

This notice shall state the period within which interested parties may make known their views in writing and may apply to be given a hearing by the Commission in accordance with Article 7 (5).

The Court shall give its decision in the form of a judgment after having given the parties an opportunity to submit their observations and after hearing the Advocate-General.

No third party, private or public, may have access to the case-file or to the procedural documents without the express authorization of the President, after the parties have been heard.

Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limits set out in the Notice of initiation of the review.

In accordance with the provisions of Article 11(5) of the basic Regulation, all the above parties except for one user requested and were granted hearings.

The Office, when hearing an application for a declaration of invalidity of a registered Community design, shall, unless there are special grounds for continuing the hearing, of its own motion after hearing the parties, or at the request of one of the parties and after hearing the other parties, stay the proceedings where the validity of the registered Community design is already in issue on account of a counterclaim before a Community design court.

The decision to stay the proceedings shall be made by order of the President after hearing the parties and the Advocate-General; the President may refer the matter to the Court of First Instance.

Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set out in the notices of initiation.

an extract from the decision mentioned in paragraph 1, indicating in particular the date, time and place of the hearing ordered and stating the facts regarding which the parties, witnesses and experts are to be heard;

The parties directly concerned were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set in the applicable notice of initiation.

Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set in the notice of initiation.

Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set in the initiating Regulation.

The Court of First Instance sitting in plenary session shall, after hearing the parties and the Advocate General, decide whether or not to refer a case.

In accordance with the provisions of Article 6(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 ('the basic Regulation1), the parties which so requested were granted an opportunity to be heard.

The interested parties which have made themselves known in accordance with Article 10 (14), shall be heard if they have, within the period prescribed in the notice published in the Official Journal of the European Communities, made a written request for a hearing showing that they are an interested party likely to be affected by the result of the proceeding and that there are particular reasons why they should be heard.

In accordance with the provisions of Article 6(5) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (the 'basic Regulation'), the parties which so requested were granted an opportunity to be heard.

In accordance with the provisions of Article 20(1) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 ('basic Regulation'), all interested parties who requested a hearing were granted an opportunity to be heard by the Commission.

If oral evidence of witnesses and experts is requested by a party, the decision of the Office shall determine the period of time within which the party filing the request must make known to the Office the names and addresses of the witnesses and experts whom the party wishes to be heard.

All parties which so requested within the time limit, and which demonstrated that there were particular reasons why they should be heard, were granted the opportunity to be heard.

Classification in this category is subject to the control of the Hearing Officer, who will if necessary certify that the papers contained therein are 'internal documents`.

It shall so hear them if they have, within the periods prescribed in the notice published in the Official Journal of the European Communities, made a written request for a hearing showing that they are an interested party likely to be affected by the result of the proceeding and that there are particular reasons why they should be given a hearing.

In accordance with the provisions of Article 11(5) of Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 (hereinafter referred to as the 'basic Regulation'), all interested parties who requested a hearing were granted such a hearing.

The interested parties which have made themselves known in accordance with Article 5(5) and the government of China shall be heard if they have, within the period prescribed in the notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union, made a written request for a hearing showing that they are an interested party actually likely to be affected by the result of the proceeding and that there are particular reasons why they should be heard.

The Court may make the summoning of a witness for whose examination a party has applied conditional upon the deposit with the cashier of the Court of a sum sufficient to cover the taxed costs thereof;

The proceedings of the conciliator or conciliation committee shall be as informal and expeditious as is compatible with a just and objective settlement of the dispute and shall be based on a fair hearing of each party.

The Commission officially advised the authorities of the exporting country of the initiation of the interim review and gave all parties directly concerned the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing.

If one of the parties, duly notified under these rules, fails to appear at a hearing, without showing sufficient cause for such failure, the tribunal may proceed with the arbitration.

In accordance with the provisions of Article 20(1) of Regulation (EC) No 384/ 96 (the 'basic Regulation'), all interested parties who requested a hearing were granted an opportunity to be heard by the Commission.

The Commission shall afford other involved parties who have so requested in their written comments the opportunity to express their views orally in a formal hearing if they show a sufficient interest.

The Court may, on application by a party or of its own motion, issue letters rogatory for the examination of witnesses or experts, as provided for in the supplementary rules mentioned in Article 125 of these Rules.

In accordance with Article 11(5) of Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 (hereinafter referred to as the 'basic Regulation'), all interested parties who requested a hearing were granted an opportunity to be heard by the Commission.

Whereas, to this end, more detailed provisions should be introduced on the opening of investigations, on the checks and inspections required, on the hearing of those concerned, the treatment of information obtained and the criteria for assessing injury;

In accordance with the provisions of Article 11(5) of Regulation (EC) No 2026/ 97 (hereinafter referred to as `the basic Regulation` ), all interested parties who requested a hearing were granted an opportunity to be heard by the Commission.

In accordance with the provisions of Article 20(1) of Regulation (EC) No 384/ 96 (hereinafter referred to as the 'basic Regulation'), all interested parties who requested a hearing were granted an opportunity to be heard by the Commission.

The Chamber to which the latter belongs shall, after considering the written observations of the opposite party and after hearing the Advocate-General, decide whether legal aid should be granted in full or in part, or whether it should be refused.

In accordance with the provisions of Article 11(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 (hereinafter referred to as the 'basic Regulation'), all interested parties who requested a hearing were granted an opportunity to be heard by the Commission.

A Community trade mark court hearing an action referred to in Article 92, other than an action for a declaration of non-infringement shall, unless there are special grounds for continuing the hearing, of its own motion after hearing the parties or at the request of one of the parties and after hearing the other parties, stay the proceedings where the validity of the Community trade mark is already in issue before another Community trade mark court on account of a counterclaim or where an application for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity has already been filed at the Office.

It shall hear them if they have, within the period prescribed in the notice published in the Official Journal of the European Communities, made a written request for a hearing showing that they are a party primarily concerned by the result of the procedure.

The tribunal may inquire of the parties if they have any further evidence to offer or witnesses to be heard or submissions to make and, if there are none, it may declare the hearing closed.

The decision to delegate a case to a single Judge in the situations set out in Article 14(2) shall be taken, after the parties have been heard, unanimously by the Chamber composed of three Judges before which the case is pending.