Document review

The tender documents shall be translated into English and reviewed by the Bank.

The need for continued storage shall be reviewed annually and the review documented.

reviewing any documentation that is appended to the regulations specified in paragraph 6.2.4.1.2. of this Article;

(ii) Data reviews have been performed and documented according to generally recognized scientific principles and procedures;

The Chemical Review Committee shall review the information it receives under paragraph 1. For each chemical that the Chemical Review Committee decides, in accordance with the relevant criteria in Annex II or, as the case may be, Annex IV, to recommend for removal from Annex III, it shall prepare a revised draft decision guidance document.

For each chemical that the Chemical Review Committee has decided to recommend for listing in Annex III, it shall prepare a draft decision guidance document.

If within a time period granted by the court the attorney fails to submit the document empowering him to file an action or a means of ordinary judicial review, the court shall reject any action or means of ordinary judicial review which he has filed.

The need for continued storage of personal data relating to individuals as referred to in Article 10(1) shall be reviewed every year and the review documented.

Information regarding the effectiveness and costs of control measures is based on documents received and reviewed by the Task Force and the Preparatory Working Group on POPs.

(3) Prior to determining the location and/or issue of a building permit, an adequate review of the project documentation must be carried out, which shall be done by the Administration.

The review process shall be undertaken on the basis of notifications submitted by Members in relation to such matters and at such intervals as shall be determined, as well as on the basis of such documentation as the Secretariat may be requested to prepare in order to facilitate the review process.

reviewing of existing documents (Strategy, Articles of Associations of individual companies, strategic and Annual Plans of individual companies, recommendations regarding good practice of governance in the Republic of Slovenia, etc.),

8.1.3.2 The QAR should document the results of the RGQA review and should include all significant factors pertaining to quality and the performance of GQA. Any unresolved matters, non-conformance or discrepancies noted should be communicated to the Delegator.

(4) Until the parties have been acquainted with the procedure referred to in the preceding paragraph, the reviewing and copying of those parts of the documents that refer to the applications of other parties in the procedure and the circumstances related thereto shall not be permitted.

The information regarding emission control performance and costs is based on official documentation of the Executive Body and its subsidiary bodies, in particular documents received and reviewed by the Task Force on Heavy Metal Emissions and the Ad Hoc Preparatory Working Group on Heavy Metals.

If an investment programme or project assignment was previously formulated, the project designer shall be obliged to review this and draw attention to any deficiencies or non-compliance with spatial planning documents, building regulations or other regulations, requesting that such be rectified.

Conditions for the review of the computer-processed documentation and records

(3) The request for review of operations shall comprise a specific list of documents and records that are subject to review.

(2) The National Review Commission shall decide on the review claim and issue a conclusion not later than 15 days following the receipt of the review claim and the documentation.

The ship security assessment shall be documented, reviewed, accepted and retained by the Company.

(4) The President of the National Review Commission shall not later than one month after his appointment prepare a document on professional and administrative posts in the National Review Commission.

(2) After having received the information that the issuer of the review claim intends to proceed to the National Review Commission, the contracting entity shall not later than three days after recede the entire documentation to the National Review Commission enclosed by his/her opinion.

Within the 60-day period, the EDF Committee shall discuss the annual review on the basis of a document to be submitted by the Commission.

(2) Before making the final decision, the National Review Commission may ask for additional explanations from the contracting entity or the issuer of the review claim; it may also review other documents and the actual situation of both parties, and collect other information necessary for making a decision.

(1) A review expert shall, not later than eight days after his appointment, review the contracting entity's documentation and establish a grounded written opinion on the alleged infringements during the contract award procedure.

After a detailed review of these documents by NEK (by KOC-Krško Operating Committee and KSC-Krško Safety Committee) these documents will be forwarded to the Slovenian Nuclear Regulatory Body (URSJV).

After the documentation package is submitted, the process of regulatory review, safety evaluation and decision making is officially started by the SNSA.

(1) The subject under supervision shall allow the authorized person to review all records, documents and other documentation in accordance with the purpose of supervision.

These analyses are about to be completed. Each of the analyses was independently reviewed and evaluated by domestic and foreign authorized institutions and documented in a work report.

During the review process, the EDF Committee shall deliver its opinion in accordance with the provisions of Article 27 on the basis of a summary document to be submitted by the Commission.

Within the period specified for the mid-term and end-of-term reviews, the EDF Committee shall deliver its opinion in accordance with Article 27 on the basis of a document to be provided by the Commission, on:

Having reviewed document AEWA/MOP2.9, entitled "Proposed Amendments to the Action Plan", and having taken note of the proposed changes to Annex 2 of the Agreement and Table 1 of the Action Plan, which include the following

18. A 'correct tender' shall be a tender which is submitted on time and which is found, after the opening of tenders and based on the review and evaluation, to entirely fulfil all requirements from the tender documentation;

For the purpose of monitoring the implementation of multiannual guidance programmes, Member States shall transmit to the Commission, before 1 May each year, a document reviewing the progress made with their multiannual guidance programme.

In performing their work, all employees in the National Review Commission are bound to protect data relating to the national, military, official or business confidence and handle the documents in accordance with the degree of confidentiality.

(2) In fixing the time limit for submission of bids, contractors shall provide for an extended time limit, if the preparation of tenders requires a review of voluminous contract documents or lengthy technical specifications, a visit to the site, and so forth.

(4) In the event from Article 94 paragraph 3 hereunder, a request for a review shall comprise a specific list of documentation and records which have to be submitted in the form of computer printouts or copies, as well as the time limit for the submittal thereof.

(2) The subject under supervision shall enable an authorized person of the Institute at his request to review the documentation and the records to the extent necessary for a particular supervision or to the extent provided for by the law governing a particular supervision.

(1) The subject under supervision who processes the data and/or books of account and other records by computer shall, at the request of the authorized person of the Institute, provide appropriate appliances for the review of documentation and records, as well as for testing the compliance of the computer-processed data.

In the second category, a judgment should only be certified as a European Enforcement Order if the Member State of origin has an appropriate mechanism in place enabling the debtor to apply for a full review of the judgment under the conditions set out in Article 19 in those exceptional cases where, in spite of compliance with Article 14, the document has not reached the addressee.

Detailed requirements or guidance for the licensing process involving modifications to the SAR and the plant are presently not established in either the Slovene regulations or in the operating license. Such guidance could, for example, include criteria to categorize the SAR changes and plant modifications, the content of the application document and the content of the independent third-party review.

(2) The subject under supervision shall ensure that at the time of the review carried out by the authorized persons of the Institute in the rooms from Article 94 paragraph 1 hereof, these persons will have authorized persons of the subject under supervision available in the rooms who will be able, if requested, to provide explanations related to the documentation and the records that are subject to supervision.

"Slovenia is pleased to note that the EU noted that the whole territory of Slovenia will be considered as one single region at NUTS 2 level for the period up to the end of 2006, that Slovenia intends to implement one Single Programming Document covering the whole territory of Slovenia for the programming period up to the end of 2006, and that Slovenia will continue discussions on the territorial division ensuring balanced regional developmentwith the Commission in order to review, already being a Member State, its NUTS classification at the end of 2006 at the latest.