Complainant Community producers

Procedures for Multiple Complainants

The written submissions by each of the complainants shall be made available to the other complainants, and each complainant shall have the right to be present when any one of the other complainants presents its views to the panel.

If in a specific case, following a complaint by a presumptive data subject, such monitoring by the appropriate monitoring bodies or other competent organizations establishes that Slovenia was responsible for unlawful processing, inaccuracies or other irregularities, the appropriate monitoring body or other competent organizations may only inform the complainant that the body has conducted the monitoring and that the body can neither confirm nor deny that the complainant's information was processed in order to be transmitted to the other Party to this Agreement.

A fee for the ADR shall be paid by the complainant.

The domain name shall be transferred to the complainant if the complainant applies for this domain name and satisfies the general eligibility criteria set out in Article 4(2)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 733/2002.

38.4 The Board of Directors of the ICF makes its decision and addresses it in writing to the complainant party.

Where the Commission has informed the complainant of its intention to reject a complaint pursuant to Article 7(1) the complainant may request access to the documents on which the Commission bases its provisional assessment.

The three complainant Community producers replied to the questionnaires and fully cooperated in the investigation.

I. Information regarding the complainant and the undertaking(s) or association of undertakings giving rise to the complaint

The decision shall be notified to the Registry and the complainant by registered post or other equivalent electronic means.

If the complainant makes known its views within the time-limit set by the Commission and the written submissions made by the complainant do not lead to a different assessment of the complaint, the Commission shall reject the complaint by decision.

Set out the grounds on which you claim a legitimate interest as complainant pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003.

A complainant's right to consult the files does not share the same basis as the rights of defence of the addressees of a statement of objections, and there are no grounds for treating the rights of the complainant as equivalent to those of the firms objected to.

Any written communication to a complainant or respondent shall be made by the preferred means stated by the complainant or respondent, respectively, or in the absence of such specification electronically via the Internet, provided that a record of transmission is available.

Participation of complainants in proceedings

Where the Commission considers that on the basis of the information in its possession there are insufficient grounds for acting on a complaint, it shall inform the complainant of its reasons and set a time-limit within which the complainant may make known its views in writing.

The complainant shall also submit a non-confidential version of the complaint, if confidentiality is claimed for any part of the complaint.

Indicate the position of the complainant vis-à-vis the undertaking(s) or association of undertakings complained of (e.g. customer, competitor).

The documents to which the complainant has had access in the context of proceedings conducted by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty may only be used by the complainant for the purposes of judicial or administrative proceedings for the application of those Treaty provisions.

If the complainant fails to make known its views within the time-limit set by the Commission, the complaint shall be deemed to have been withdrawn.

Where the Commission issues a statement of objections relating to a matter in respect of which it has received a complaint, it shall provide the complainant with a copy of the non-confidential version of the statement of objections and set a time-limit within which the complainant may make known its views in writing.

On this basis, the three complainant Community producers constitute the Community industry within the meaning of Article 4(1) and Article 5(4) of the basic Regulation.

Nevertheless, a complainant who has been informed of the intention to reject his complaint may request access to the documents on which the Commission based its position.

Where the complainant is an undertaking, identify the corporate group to which it belongs and provide a concise overview of the nature and scope of its business activities.

For this purpose, the complainant may however not have access to business secrets and other confidential information belonging to other parties involved in the proceedings.

The complaints and the responses to those complaints must be submitted to an ADR provider chosen by the complainant from the list referred to in the first paragraph of Article 23.

As soon as a request for ADR is properly filed with the ADR provider and the appropriate fee is paid, the ADR provider shall inform the Registry of the identity of the complainant and the domain name involved.

Where the Commission rejects a complaint on the grounds that a competition authority of a Member State is dealing with it or has already done so, it should inform the complainant of the identity of that authority.

Where insufficient evidence has been presented, the Commission shall, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 15(2), inform the complainant within 45 days of the date on which the complaint was lodged.

Where the Commission rejects a complaint pursuant to Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003, it shall inform the complainant without delay of the national competition authority which is dealing or has already dealt with the case.

Questionnaire replies were received from the five sampled complainant Community producers, from a representative sample of eight exporting producers (plus three related companies) in India and one unrelated importer in the Community.

other Community producers which were not complainants and did not cooperate.

other Community producers which were not complainants and did not cooperate.

Questionnaire replies were received from the five sampled complainant Community producers, from the six sampled exporting producers in Pakistan, three exporting producers requesting individual examination and two unrelated importers in the Community.

they do not relate to the rights of third parties, and complainants in particular.

The Commission officially advised the complainant Community producers, exporting producers in the PRC, importers/traders, user industries, and associations of users known to be concerned, as well as the representatives of the Chinese Government of the initiation of the review.

The Commission officially advised the exporting producers and importers known to be concerned as well as their associations, the representatives of the exporting country concerned, the complainant Community producers, known associations of producers, as well as known users, of the initiation of the proceeding.

The proceeding was initiated following a complaint lodged in November 2002 by the Committee of the Cotton and Allied Textile Industries of the European Communities (Eurocoton or "the complainant") on behalf of producers representing more than 25 % of the total Community production of cotton-type bedlinen.

The Commission officially advised the exporting producers and importers known to be concerned as well as their associations, the representatives of the exporting country concerned, the complainant and the other Community producers, known associations of producers as well as known users, of the initiation of the proceeding.

all producers which were selected in the sample (the sampled Community producers) were also complainants,

The proceeding was initiated following a complaint lodged in November 2002 by the Committee of the Cotton and Allied Textile Industries of the European Communities ("Eurocoton" or "the complainant") on behalf of producers representing a major proportion of the total Community production of cotton-type bed linen.

The ADR provider shall examine the complaint for compliance with its rules of procedure, with the provisions of this Regulation and with Regulation (EC) No 733/2002, and, unless non-compliance is established, shall forward the complaint to the respondent within five working days following receipt of the fees to be paid by the complainant.

In order to assist complainants in submitting the necessary facts to the Commission, a form should be drawn up.

all producers which were selected in the sample ("the sampled Community producers") were also complainants,