(ii) that the description, the claims, or the drawings, are so unclear, or the claims are so inadequately supported by the description, that no meaningful opinion can be formed on the novelty, inventive step (non-obviousness), or industrial applicability, of the claimed invention, the said Authority shall not go into the questions referred to in Article 33(1) and shall inform the applicant of this opinion and the reasons therefore.
(II) da opis, patentni zahtevki ali skice niso jasni ali da patentni zahtevki ustrezno ne temeljijo na opisu, tako da ni mogoče dati določenega mnenja glede novosti, rezultata ustvarjalnega dela (neočitnosti) ali industrijske uporabljivosti izuma, katerega varstvo se zahteva, ne obravnava vprašanj, navedenih v prvem odstavku 33. člena, s tem mnenjem in s svojimi razlogi pa seznani prijavitelja.