(c) A Contracting Party may require that the request be subject to a declaration by the requesting party stating that the mistake was made in good faith.

(2)(a) Subject to the provisions of subparagraph (b), each designated Office shall, provided that the national fee (if any) has been paid and the appropriate translation (as prescribed) has been furnished within the prescribed time limit, decide whether the refusal, declaration, or finding, referred to in paragraph (1) was justified under the provisions of this Treaty and the Regulations, and, if it finds that the refusal or declaration was the result of an error or omission on the part of the receiving Office or that the finding was the result of an error or omission on the part of the International Bureau, it shall, as far as effects in the State of the designated Office are concerned, treat the international application as if such error or omission had not occurred.

(4) [Single Request for More Than One Application and/or Registration in Respect of a Change in Name and/or Address, a Change in Ownership or a Correction of a Mistake] Any State or intergovernmental organization may declare that, notwithstanding Article 10(1)(e), 10(2) and 10(3), Article 11(1)(h) and 11(3) and Article 12(1)(e) and 12(2), a request for the recordal of a change in name and/or address, a request for the recordal of a change in ownership and a request for the correction of a mistake may only relate to one application or one registration.

A clerical error occurred in the second sentence of recital 92 of the Provisional Regulation, that should have read as follows:

Obvious formal errors such as typing errors on an EUR.1 movement certificate, or an invoice declaration should not cause this document to be rejected if these errors are not such as to create doubts concerning the correctness of the statements made in this document.

Obvious formal errors such as typing errors on a movement certificate EUR.l, or an invoice declaration, should not cause this document to be rejected if these errors are not such as to create doubts concerning the correctness of the statements made in this document.

issuance of a statement, giving details of the inadequacies or faults found which might affect the validity of studies conducted in the test facility,

(55) It should be noted that the findings in recital 89 of the provisional Decision concerning the Community industry's profitability have been revised to take account of a calculation error which occurred at the provisional stage.

by the user, or potential user, of the implementation, as a basis for initially checking the possibility of interworking with another implementation (note that, while interworking can never be guaranteed, failure to interwork can often be predicted from incompatible PICSs);

Based on the methodology explained in recitals 136 to 139 of the provisional Regulation, and taking into account the modifications mentioned above and the correction of clerical errors, the difference between the prices, expressed as a percentage of the Community industry's weighted average price (ex works), i.e. the price undercutting margin, is shown in the table below.

It should be noted that the findings in recital 89 of the provisional Decision concerning the Community industry's profitability have been revised to take account of a calculation error which occurred at the provisional stage.

Based on the methodology explained in recitals 216 to 219 of the provisional Regulation, and taking into account the modifications mentioned in recitals 111 and 115 above and the correction of clerical errors, the weighted average export prices of SWR were compared with the selling prices charged by the Community industry in the Community market - adjusted to reflect a profit margin of 5 %.