The administrations that are being consulted may request any other information they need to assess the probability of harmful interference to their own service.

The administrations that are being consulted may request any other information they need to assess the probability of harmful interference to their own services.

The purpose of the review is to evaluate whether the chemical is likely, as a result of its long-range environmental transport, to lead to significant adverse human health and/or environmental effects, such that global action is warranted.

When a Party is considering proposed environmental measures, it should evaluate possible adverse effects on the exercise of rights contained in this Agreement, and, if such measures are adopted, it should take appropriate steps to mitigate any such adverse effects.

The following does not have to be classified as significant damage:

Where business secrets or other confidential information are necessary to prove an infringement, the Commission should assess for each individual document whether the need to disclose is greater than the harm which might result from disclosure.

Moreover, if some metabolites are suspected for endocrine disrupting activity, it is recommended to determine if these have potential to result in adverse affects as soon as validated testing schemes to assess such adverse effects are available.

assess and minimise the damage done;

an evaluation of the consequences should these adverse effects be realized;

As a general remark it must be underlined that the injury suffered by the Community industry must be assessed by reference to the IP.

(d) In the event of failure, to assess the damage caused, limit its consequences and adopt the necessary remedial measures.

in the event of failure, to assess the damage caused, limit its consequences and adopt the necessary remedial measures.

The purpose of the injury investigation is to evaluate the effect of the dumped imports on the economic situation of the Community industry during the IP.

In such cases, the risk associated with that particular adverse effect could be assessed as 'negligible' or insignificant.

"assessment" shall mean any method used to calculate, predict, estimate or measure the value of a noise indicator or the related harmful effects;

Consequently, the GOA claimed that no proper assessment could be made as to whether the injury suffered by the Community industry was material.

In relation to this particular point, it is recalled that this investigation should evaluate the likelihood of recurrence of dumping and injury in case the measures are removed.

an estimation of the overall risk posed by the living modified organism based on the evaluation of the likelihood and consequences of the identified adverse effects being realized;

The NSA of the Member State making the release, or the GSC Security Office, will take all the necessary measures to facilitate any consequent damage assessment and review of procedures.

an evaluation of the likelihood of these adverse effects being realized, taking into account the level and kind of exposure of the likely potential receiving environment to the living modified organism;

This claim has thus been rejected and it is concluded that all imports originating in India, Malaysia and Thailand should be cumulated in order to assess the injury suffered by the Community industry.

For each adverse effect identified, the relative likelihood of the consequence can probably not be assessed quantitatively, but it can be expressed in terms of 'high', 'moderate', 'low' or 'negligible'.

The purpose of this analysis is not to do an end-point to end-point analysis but rather to assess the developments within the entire period considered in order to determine whether the situation of the Community industry in the IP can be considered as injurious.

The GOA claimed that in the absence of data relating to the profitability of the Community industry prior to the appearance of dumped imports, no proper assessment could be made as to whether the injury suffered by the Community industry was material.

The purpose of the study of the ecotoxicity of a veterinary medicinal product is to assess the potential harmful effects which the use of the product may cause to the environment and to identify any precautionary measures which may be necessary to reduce such risks.

Once the proposed final classification and containment conditions have been determined, the level of human and environmental exposure should be reassessed (Procedure 1). This should confirm that the possibility of any harmful effects occurring, taking into account the nature and scale of the work and the proposed containment conditions are acceptably low.

(47) In the provisional Regulation, the Commission concluded that the dumped imports from Russia, the Czech Republic, Romania and the Slovak Republic should be assessed cumulatively for the purpose of injury analysis, on the grounds that the products concerned were imported from each exporting country in substantial quantities, held a significant market share and competed with each other and with those manufactured by the Community industry.

The following does not have to be classified as significant damage:

In the event of failure, to assess the damage caused, limit its consequences and adopt the necessary remedial measures.

The risk characterization shall entail an evaluation of the likelihood that an adverse effect will be caused under the reasonably foreseeable conditions of use.

In such cases, the risk associated with that particular adverse effect could be assessed as "negligible" or insignificant.

For this reason, it is confirmed that, in order to assess the injury suffered, trends had to be established for the Community industry as defined at the time of initiation of this proceeding, over a number of years.

For each adverse effect identified, the relative likelihood of the consequence can probably not be assessed quantitatively, but it can be expressed in terms of "high", "moderate", "low" or "negligible".

Thus, the extent of any injurious dumping caused by an exporting producer to the Community industry should be assessed on the actual market situation and on the basis of specific data verified for each company.

Where business secrets or other confidential information are necessary to prove an infringement, the Commission should assess for each individual document whether the need to disclose is greater than the harm which might result from disclosure.

Moreover, if some metabolites are suspected for endocrine disrupting activity, it is recommended to determine if these have potential to result in adverse affects as soon as validated testing schemes to assess such adverse effects are available.

With respect to skin sensitization and respiratory sensitization, in so far as there is no consensus on the possibility of identifying a dose/concentration below which adverse effects are unlikely to occur in a subject already sensitized to a given substance, it shall be sufficient to evaluate whether the substance has an inherent capacity to cause such effects.

Where, despite a N(L)oael not having been determined, the test results nevertheless demonstrate a relationship between dose/concentration and the severity of an adverse effect or where, in connection with a test method which entails the use of only one dose or concentration, it is possible to evaluate the relative severity of the effect, such information shall also be taken into account in evaluating the likelihood of the effect occurring.

For the purpose of establishing whether the Community industry had suffered injury and, in this context, for determining consumption and the various economic indicators related to the situation of the Community industry, it had to be examined whether injury and consumption should be assessed in relation to the total Community production or whether this analysis should focus on the production in the Community destined for the open market.

With the objective of assuring prompt and adequate compensation in respect of all damage caused by pollution of the marine environment, States shall cooperate in the implementation of existing international law and the further development of international law relating to responsibility and liability for the assessment of and compensation for damage and the settlement of related disputes, as well as, where appropriate, development of criteria and procedures for payment of adequate compensation, such as compulsory insurance or compensation funds.

In the provisional Regulation, the Commission concluded that the dumped imports from Russia, the Czech Republic, Romania and the Slovak Republic should be assessed cumulatively for the purpose of injury analysis, on the grounds that the products concerned were imported from each exporting country in substantial quantities, held a significant market share and competed with each other and with those manufactured by the Community industry.