Iskalni niz je ali predolg ali pa vsebuje preveč besed.
Prevodi: sl > en
1–27/27
predložiti zadevo Sodišču
1 Objavljeno
okolje
Ur. l. RS, št. MP 1994-33
Pravica predložiti zadevo Sodišču pripada samo visokim pogodbenim strankam in Komisiji.
Only the High Contracting Parties and the Commission shall have the right to bring a case before the Court.
2 Objavljeno
okolje
Ur. l. RS, št. MP 1994-33
»Pravica predložiti zadevo Sodišču pripada samo visokim pogodbenim strankam, Komisiji in posamezniku, nevladni organizaciji ali skupini posameznikov, ki so vložili pritožbo na podlagi 25. člena.«
"Only the High Contracting Parties, the Commission, and persons, non-governmental organisations or groups of individuals having submitted a petition under Article 25 shall have the right to bring a case before the Court."
3 Objavljeno
izobraževanje
Ur. l. RS, št. MP 2005-15
Kadar je takšno vprašanje postavljeno v postopku, ki teče pred sodiščem države članice, zoper odločitev katerega po nacionalnem pravu ni pravnega sredstva, je to sodišče dolžno predložiti zadevo Sodišču.
Where any such question is raised in a case pending before a court or tribunal of a Member State against whose decisions there is no judicial remedy under national law, that court or tribunal shall bring the matter before the Court.
4 Objavljeno
okolje
Ur. l. RS, št. MP 2001-101
Stranki lahko v skladu s 64. členom predložita dokaze, ki so pomembni za zadevo. Sodišče ima pravico zahtevati predložitev vseh dokazov, za katere meni, da so potrebni za ugotovitev resnice.
The parties may submit evidence relevant to the case, in accordance with article 64. The Court shall have the authority to request the submission of all evidence that it considers necessary for the determination of the truth.
5 Objavljeno
delo in sociala
Ur. l. RS, št. MP 2007-19
V skladu s Statutom Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti ima vsaka država članica ne glede na to, ali je dala izjavo na podlagi člena 2 ali ne, pravico predložiti Sodišču Evropskih skupnosti vloge ali pisna stališča v zadevah iz člena 1.
In accordance with the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Communities, any Member State, whether or not it has made a declaration pursuant to Article 2, shall be entitled to submit statements of case or written observations to the Court of Justice of the European Communities in cases which arise pursuant to Article 1.
6 Objavljeno
izobraževanje
Ur. l. RS, št. MP 2005-15
(2) Če Komisija meni, da zadevna država članica ni sprejela potrebnih ukrepov za izvršitev sodbe Sodišča Evropske unije iz prejšnjega odstavka, lahko pred Sodiščem vloži tožbo, potem ko je tej državi dala možnost za predložitev stališče.
If the Commission considers that the Member State concerned has not taken the necessary measures to comply with the judgment referred to in paragraph 1, it may bring the case before the Court of Justice of the European Union after giving that State the opportunity to submit its observations.
7 Objavljeno
Ur. l. RS, št. MP 2010-24
V primeru spora med pogodbenicami glede razlage ali uporabe te konvencije si pogodbenice prizadevajo rešiti spor s pogajanji ali na drug miroljuben način po svoji izbiri, vključno s predložitvijo spora Konferenca pogodbenic, arbitražnemu sodišču, katerega odločitve so za pogodbenice zavezujoče, ali Meddržavnemu sodišču, kot sta se sporazumeli zadevni stranki.
4 In case of a dispute between Parties as to the interpretation or application of the Convention, they shall seek a settlement of the dispute through negotiation or any other peaceful means of their choice, including submission of the dispute to the COP, to an arbitral tribunal whose decisions shall be binding upon the Parties, or to the International Court of Justice, as agreed upon by the Parties concerned.
8 Objavljeno
izobraževanje
Ur. l. RS, št. MP 2005-15
V dveh mesecih od tega uradnega obvestila smejo stranke, države članice, Komisija in, kjer je to primerno, institucija, organ, urad ali agencija, ki je sprejela akt, katerega veljavnost ali razlaga je predmet postopka, predložiti Sodišču navedbe o zadevi ali pisna stališča.
Within two months of this notification, the parties, the Member States, the Commission and, where appropriate, the institution, body, office or agency which adopted the act the validity or interpretation of which is in dispute, shall be entitled to submit statements of case or written observations to the Court of Justice.
9 Objavljeno
okolje
Ur. l. RS, št. MP 2001-101
Če država pogodbenica v nasprotju z določbami tega statuta ne ravna v skladu z zahtevo Sodišča za sodelovanje ter s tem prepreči Sodišču opravljanje njegovih nalog in pooblastil po tem statutu, sme Sodišče to ugotoviti in zadevo predložiti Skupščini držav pogodbenic ali Varnostnemu svetu, če je ta predložil zadevo Sodišču.
Where a State Party fails to comply with a request to cooperate by the Court contrary to the provisions of this Statute, thereby preventing the Court from exercising its functions and powers under this Statute, the Court may make a finding to that effect and refer the matter to the Assembly of States Parties or, where the Security Council referred the matter to the Court, to the Security Council.
10 Objavljeno
izobraževanje
Ur. l. RS, št. MP 2005-15
Kadar sporazum, ki ga Svet na določenem področju sklene z eno ali več tretjimi državami, določa, da imajo te države pravico na Sodišču vložiti vlogo ali predložiti pisna stališča, če sodišče države članice predloži Sodišču v predhodno odločanje vprašanje iz okvira tega sporazuma, se o odločitvi nacionalnega sodišča, ki vsebuje to vprašanje, uradno obvestijo tudi zadevne tretje države.
Where an agreement relating to a specific subject matter, concluded by the Council and one or more non-member countries, provides that those countries are to be entitled to submit statements of case or written observations where a court or tribunal of a Member State refers to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling on a question falling within the scope of the agreement, the decision of the national court or tribunal containing that question shall also be notified to the non-member countries concerned.
11 Objavljeno
delo in sociala
Ur. l. RS, št. MP 2007-19
Zvezna republika Nemčija, Helenska republika, Kraljevina Nizozemska in Republika Avstrija si pridržujejo pravico, da v svoji notranji zakonodaji določijo, da bo sodišče, kadar se v zadevi, o kateri se odloča pred nacionalnim sodiščem, postavi vprašanje, ki se nanaša na razlago Konvencije o zaščiti finančnih interesov Evropskih skupnosti in prvega Protokola k tej konvenciji in zoper odločbo ni nobenega pravnega sredstva, zavezano zadevo predložiti Evropskemu sodišču.
The Federal Republic of Germany, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Republic of Austria, reserve the right to make provision in their national law to the effect that, where a question relating to the interpretation of the Convention on the protection of the European Communities' financial interests and the first Protocol thereto is raised in a case pending before a national court or tribunal against whose decision there is no judicial remedy under national law, that court or tribunal will be required to refer the matter to the Court of Justice.
12 Končna redakcija
izobraževanje
CELEX: 11957E
Kadar je takšno vprašanje postavljeno v postopku, ki teče pred sodiščem države članice, zoper odločitev katerega po nacionalnem pravu ni pravnega sredstva, je to sodišče dolžno predložiti zadevo Sodišču.
Where any such question is raised in a case pending before a court or tribunal of a Member State, against whose decisions there is no judicial remedy under national law, that court or tribunal shall bring the matter before the Court of Justice.
13 Končna redakcija
izobraževanje
CELEX: 11997D
Kadar je takšno vprašanje postavljeno v postopku, ki teče pred sodiščem države članice, zoper odločitev katerega po nacionalnem pravu ni pravnega sredstva, je to sodišče dolžno predložiti zadevo Sodišču.
Where any such question is raised in a case pending before a court or tribunal of a Member State against whose decisions there is no judicial remedy under national law, that court or tribunal shall bring the matter before the Court of Justice.
14 Končna redakcija
DRUGO
Kadar je takšno vprašanje postavljeno v postopku, ki teče pred sodiščem države članice, zoper odločitev katerega po nacionalnem pravu ni pravnega sredstva, je to sodišče dolžno predložiti zadevo Sodišču."
Where any such question is raised in a case pending before a court or tribunal of a Member State against whose decisions there is no judicial remedy under national law, that court or tribunal shall bring the matter before the Court of Justice.'
15 Končna redakcija
DRUGO
Sodišču ni mogoče predložiti nikakršne zadeve, dokler ni objavljen njegov poslovnik.
No matter may be brought before the Court of Justice until its rules of procedure have been published.
16 Končna redakcija
DRUGO
Konferenca ugotavlja, da si lahko države članice pri dajanju izjav na podlagi člena K.7(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji pridržijo pravico, da v nacionalnem pravu predvidijo določbe za primer, če se postavi vprašanje o veljavnosti ali razlagi akta iz člena K.7(1) v postopku, ki teče pred nacionalnim sodiščem, zoper odločitev katerega po nacionalnem pravu ni pravnega sredstva, zaradi česar bo to sodišče dolžno predložiti zadevo Sodišču.
The Conference notes that Member States may, when making a declaration pursuant to Article K.7(2) of the Treaty on European Union, reserve the right to make provisions in their national law to the effect that, where a question relating to the validity or interpretation of an act referred to in Article K.7(1) is raised in a case pending before a national court or tribunal against whose decision there is no judicial remedy under national law, that court or tribunal will be required to refer the matter to the Court of Justice.
17 Končna redakcija
DRUGO
Ob zgornji izjavi si Kraljevina Belgija, Zvezna republika Nemčija, Veliko vojvodstvo Luksemburg in Republika Avstrija pridržijo pravico, da v nacionalnem pravu predvidijo določbe za primer, če se postavi vprašanje o veljavnosti ali razlagi akta iz člena K.7(1) v postopku, ki teče pred nacionalnim sodiščem, zoper odločitev katerega po nacionalnem pravu ni pravnega sredstva, zaradi česar je to nacionalno sodišče dolžno predložiti zadevo Sodišču."
When making the above declaration, the Kingdom of Belgium, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and the Republic of Austria reserved the right to make provisions in their national law to the effect that, where a question relating to the validity or interpretation of an act referred to in Article K.7(1) is raised in a case pending before a national court or tribunal against whose decision there is no judicial remedy under national law, that court or tribunal will be required to refer the matter to the Court of Justice`.
18 Končna redakcija
DRUGO
V dveh mesecih od tega uradnega obvestila smejo stranke, države članice, Komisija in, kjer je to primerno, Evropski parlament, Svet in Evropska centralna banka predložiti Sodišču navedbe o zadevi ali pisne izjave.
Within two months of this notification, the parties, the Member States, the Commission and, where appropriate, the European Parliament, the Council and the European Central Bank, shall be entitled to submit statements of case or written observations to the Court.
19 Končna redakcija
DRUGO
Če Komisija meni, da zadevna država članica takšnih ukrepov ni sprejela, poda svoje obrazloženo mnenje, potem ko je tej državi dala možnost za predložitev pripomb, in v njem podrobno navede, v katerih točkah država članica ni izvršila sodbe Sodišča.
If the Commission considers that the Member State concerned has not taken such measures it shall, after giving that State the opportunity to submit its observations, issue a reasoned opinion specifying the points on which the Member State concerned has not complied with the judgment of the Court of Justice.
20 Končna redakcija
finance
CELEX: 31999R0659
Če država članica ne izpolni odredbe o začasnem odlogu ali odredbe o vračilu, je Komisija upravičena, medtem ko opravlja vsebinski pregled zadeve na podlagi razpoložljivih podatkov, zadevo predložiti neposredno Sodišču Evropskih skupnosti in zaprositi za izjavo, da je neizpolnjevanje kršitev Pogodbe.
If the Member State fails to comply with a suspension injunction or a recovery injunction, the Commission shall be entitled, while carrying out the examination on the substance of the matter on the basis of the information available, to refer the matter to the Court of Justice of the European Communities direct and apply for a declaration that the failure to comply constitutes an infringement of the Treaty.
21 Končna redakcija
finance
CELEX: 31999R0659
ker mora biti Komisiji v primeru neizpolnjevanja odredbe o predložitvi podatkov omogočeno, da odloči na podlagi razpoložljivih podatkov in v primeru nespoštovanja odredbe o začasnem odlogu ali vračilu zadevo predloži neposredno Sodišču Evropskih skupnosti skladno z drugim pododstavkom člena 93(2) Pogodbe;
whereas the Commission should be enabled in the event of non-compliance with an information injunction, to decide on the basis of the information available and, in the event of non-compliance with suspension and recovery injunctions, to refer the matter to the Court of Justice direct, in accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 93(2) of the Treaty;
22 Končna redakcija
DRUGO
Češka republika si pridržuje pravico, da v nacionalnem pravu predvidi določbo, po kateri je, v primeru vprašanja o veljavnosti ali razlage akta iz člena 35(1) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, v postopku, ki teče pred nacionalnim sodiščem, zoper odločitev katerega po nacionalnem pravu ni pravnega sredstva, to nacionalno sodišče zadevo dolžno predložiti Sodišču.
The Czech Republic reserves the right to make provision in its national law that when a question concerning the validity or interpretation of an act referred to in Article 35(1) of the Treaty on European Union is raised in a case pending before a national court or tribunal against whose decisions there is no judicial remedy under national law, that court or tribunal is obliged to bring the matter before the Court of Justice.
23 Pravna redakcija
okolje
DRUGO: 62004J0406
19 Predložitveno sodišče z vprašanjem sprašuje Sodišče, ali člena 17 ES in 18 ES, ki državljanom Evropske unije priznavata pravico do prostega gibanja in prebivanja na ozemlju držav članic, nasprotujeta določbi nacionalnega prava, ki za upravičenost do takega nadomestila, kot je v postopku v glavni stvari, določa pogoj dejanskega bivanja v zadevni državi članici, ob upoštevanju dejstva, da je navedeno nadomestilo dodeljeno brezposelnim osebam, starejšim od 50 let, ki se niso dolžne prijaviti kot iskalci zaposlitve.
19 By the question referred, the national court is asking the Court whether Articles 17 and 18 EC, under which citizens of the European Union have the right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States, preclude a provision of national law which makes entitlement to an allowance such as that at issue in the main proceedings conditional on actual residence in the Member State concerned, given that that allowance is granted to unemployed persons aged over 50 who are exempt from the requirement to register as job-seekers.
24 Pravna redakcija
okolje
DRUGO: 62004J0406
20 V zvezi s tem predložitveno sodišče navedeno nadomestilo opredeljuje kot „dajatev za brezposelnost` in tožečo stranko v postopku v glavni stvari kot „zaposleno osebo` v smislu člena 1(a) Uredbe št. 1408/71. Vendar Komisija Evropskih skupnosti zatrjuje, da naj bi navedeno nadomestilo ne pomenilo dajatve za brezposelnost, ki spada na področje uporabe Uredbe št. 1408/71, ampak dajatev za predčasno upokojitev, ki je enaka tisti v zadevi, na podlagi katere je bila izdana sodba z dne 11. julija 1996 v zadevi Otte (C-25/95, Recueil, str. I 3745), in sicer dajatev sui generis.
20 The national court categorises that allowance as `unemployment benefit` and the applicant in the main proceedings as an `employed person` within the meaning of Article 1(a) of Regulation No 1408/71. However, the Commission of the European Communities submits that rather than constituting an unemployment benefit falling within the scope of Regulation No 1408/71, that allowance could constitute a pre-retirement benefit similar to that at issue in Case C 25/95 Otte [1996] ECR I-3745 or even a sui generis benefit.
25 Prevajalska redakcija
izobraževanje
CELEX: 31985L0384
če nameravata država članica ali Komisija po členu 169 ali 170 Pogodbe predložiti zadevo Sodišču Evropskih skupnosti.
where a Member State or the Commission implements Articles 169 or 170 of the Treaty with a view to bringing the matter before the Court of Justice of the European Communities.
26 Prevajalska redakcija
izobraževanje
CELEX: 31996L0034
Brez vpliva na vlogo Komisije, nacionalnih sodišč in Evropskega sodišča, mora vsako zadevo, ki se nanaša na razlaganje tega sporazuma na evropski ravni, Komisija na prvi stopnji predložiti podpisnicam, ki podajo svoje mnenje.
Without prejudice to the respective role of the Commission, national courts and the Court of Justice, any matter relating to the interpretation of this agreement at European level should, in the first instance, be referred by the Commission to the signatory parties who will give an opinion.
27 Prevajalska redakcija
izobraževanje
CELEX: 31995L0046
Brez poseganja v upravnopravna pravna sredstva pred predložitvijo zadeve sodnemu organu, ki jih je možno med drugim predvideti pred nadzornim organom iz člena 28, države članice zagotovijo, da ima vsaka oseba v primeru kršitve pravic, zagotovljenih z nacionalno zakonodajo, ki se nanaša na zadevno obdelavo, pravico vložiti pravno sredstvo na sodišču.
Without prejudice to any administrative remedy for which provision may be made, inter alia before the supervisory authority referred to in Article 28, prior to referral to the judicial authority, Member States shall provide for the right of every person to a judicial remedy for any breach of the rights guaranteed him by the national law applicable to the processing in question.
Prevodi: sl > en
1–27/27
predložiti zadevo Sodišču