The settlement may involve the whole claim or only a part thereof.

(2) In cases from the second paragraph of Article 28 of this Law, the court shall be bound by the claim.

(2) In cases from the second paragraph of Article 30 of this Act, the court shall be bound by the claim.

The action shall not deem to be amended if the plaintiff merely modifies the legal ground of the claim, or reduces the amount of claim, or alters, amends or corrects some of his previous statements, but does not in fact change the identity of the cause of action.

When a monetary claim is supported by an authentic document the original or a certified copy of which is enclosed with the action, the court shall order the defendant to satisfy the claim (payment order):-

that the facts upon which the claim is based upon are in contradiction with evidence adduced by the plaintiff or with judicial knowledge.

For purposes of the present Chapter, a small claim dispute shall denote a dispute on a monetary claim where the amount of dispute does not exceed 200,000 tolars.

In commercial litigations, small claims shall deem to comprise any claim wherein the amount in dispute does not exceed 500,000 tolars.

In other non-monetary claims, the amount in dispute shall be defined as the amount stated by the plaintiff in action..

If the plaintiff amends the claim so that the amount of dispute exceeds 200,000 tolars, the procedure shall be brought to an end pursuant to provisions of the present Act governing the regular proceedings.

If the plaintiff has relinquished his claim until the main hearing is over, the court shall pass, without further consideration, a judgment dismissing the claim (judgment on the basis of relinquishment).

If the defendant has acknowledged the claim until the main hearing is over, the court shall pass, without further consideration, a judgment satisfying the claim (judgment on the basis of acknowledgment).

the most important statements made by the parties, particularly those by which a party has wholly or party acknowledged the claim, or relinquished the claim, or waived the right of appeal, or amended the claim, or withdrawn the action;

If in the action raising a non-monetary claims the plaintiff declares their willingness to accept a certain sum of money in lieu of satisfying the claim, such sum shall be considered as the amount in dispute.

If the defendant did not provide any cause for the bringing of the action and he has acknowledged the claim in the defense plea or at the main hearing, before becoming engaged in trying of the main subject of dispute, the plaintiff shall refund him the costs of proceedings.

If the facts stated in the action does found the claim to a sufficient extent, and if the plaintiff fails to make appropriate corrections of the action within a time period specified by a court decree, the court shall pass a judgment dismissing the claim.

if the counterclaim is in connection with the claim contained in the action; or

If upon a plea that claim has not yet fallen due the court establishes that the claim has in fact fallen due only after the payment order had been issued, it shall by a judgment set aside the payment order and determine the claim (first paragraph of Article 311).

to perform all procedural acts and, in particular, to bring an action, to withdraw the action, to acknowledge or relinquish a claim, to conclude a court settlement, to lodge any means of ordinary judicial review and to waive or withdraw the same, and to apply for interlocutory injunctions;

If the revising court establishes that the limits of the claim have been transgressed by a final judgment passed by the court of second instance, it may pass a decree to set aside this judgment and remand the case for reconsideration to the court of second instance or, depending of the nature of transgression, render a judgment to modify the attacked decision.

If prior to the completion of the main hearing conducted pursuant to provisions governing the regular proceedings the plaintiff has reduced the claim so that the amount of dispute exceeds 200,000 tolars, the procedure shall be continued pursuant to the provisions of the present Act governing the small claims procedure.

In the non-monetary claims where the subject-matter jurisdiction or the right to revision depend on the amount in dispute which the plaintiff has failed to state, the court shall act pursuant to provisions of Article 108 governing the proceedings with incomplete pleadings.

If the court of second instance establishes that the limits of the claim have been transgressed, it may set aside the judgment of the first instance and remand the case for reconsideration to the court below or, considering the nature of transgression, render a judgment modifying the attacked decision.

By issuance of a payment order, the court shall impose on the debtor a duty to satisfy the claim and pay the determined amount of costs within the term of eight days from the day of service of the payment order, in disputes involving bills of exchange or cheques such term of payment being three days, or else to file a plea against the payment order in the same period of time.

If the circumstances upon which jurisdiction is based change during the course of the proceedings, or if the plaintiff reduces the amount in dispute, the court which assumed jurisdiction upon filing of the action shall retain it, even though the changes concerned would otherwise confer the jurisdiction on another court of same type.

Small claims litigations shall also involve disputes on non-monetary claims in respect of which the plaintiff has declared his willingness to accept, instead of satisfaction the claim, a sum of money which does not exceed 500,000 tolars (first paragraph of Article 44).

Small claims disputes shall also include disputes on non-monetary claims in respect of which the plaintiff has declared his willingness to accept, in instead of satisfaction the claim, a sum of money not exceeding 200,000 tolars (first paragraph of Article 44).

In claims providing for payment of due sum of money not exceeding 200,000 tolars, the court shall issue a payment order against the defendant even though the action does not contain an authentic document, but does allege the legal basis and the amount of debt, adducing also the evidence to determine the truth such allegations.

or if his standing to sue is based upon other grounds. When the determination of a dispute is dependent upon prior resolution of the question of whether a certain right or legal relation exists or not, the plaintiff may claim, in addition to the relief in respect of the cause of action, also the resolution of such question, provided that the court conducting the proceedings has power to determine the latter claim and that both claims may be determined in the same type of procedure.

The State Prosecutor of the Republic of Slovenia may not petition for the protection of legality for reasons of transgression of limits of the claim, neither on the ground of erroneous or incomplete determination of the state of facts.

The plaintiff may join two or more mutually related claims in one action also by petitioning the court to grant to the secondary claim if it finds the primary one to be unfounded.

The plaintiff may bring an action against several defendants also by petitioning the court to grant to the claim against the secondary defendant if the claim against the primary one is finally dismissed.

The application shall contain the applicant's name and permanent address and the description of the signatory, the name of the party or names of the parties against whom the application is made, the subject- matter of the dispute, the form of order sought and a brief statement of the pleas in law on which the application is based.

If, within the time limit fixed by the tribunal, the respondent has failed to communicate his statement of defence without showing sufficient cause for such failure, the tribunal shall, after allowing for the particular constraints applying to the respondent, order that the proceedings continue and may make an award even if a defence has by then not been submitted.

The liquidator appointed by a court which has jurisdiction pursuant to Article 3(2) may in any other Member State claim through the courts or out of court that moveable property was removed from the territory of the State of the opening of proceedings to the territory of that other Member State after the opening of the insolvency proceedings.

The provisions of Article 19.2 shall apply to a counter-claim and a claim relied on for the purpose of a set-off.

In this statement of defence, or at a later stage in the arbitration proceedings, if the tribunal decides that the delay was justified under the circumstances, the respondent may make a counter-claim arising out of the same contract, or rely on a claim arising out of the same contract for the purpose of a set-off.