The submission is therefore rejected.

Therefore, the claim was accepted.

For this reason alone, the claim could already be rejected.

A good example is episiotomy which continues to be a widely used intervention even though studies indicate that its effectiveness is limited.

This claim was verified on the basis of the actual transport costs reported by the cooperating parties themselves.

The claim was verified and it was indeed found that the US dollar had depreciated against the euro by 11,4 % between the original IP and the new IP.

The assertion of the representative of Ministry of Work, Family and Social Issues, that the law about social assistance treats everybody equally, was assessed as untrue, because in their opinion the Roma receive high social assistance, while nobody supervises how this money is spent (Dolenjski list, 16.10.1997).

Therefore, this claim was rejected.

The HKETO claim was, therefore, rejected.

Claim by a Chinese exporting producer

The claim has consequently been rejected and the provisional findings are hereby confirmed.

As far as the first point is concerned, the claim was accepted and therefore the SG&A expenses regarding these costs were modified.

With regard to transport costs, the claim was rejected, since no information to support it had been provided.

The claim was based on the grounds that the import volume, the market shares and prices developed differently during the period 1997 to IP.

The claim was rejected because the company had had sufficient opportunity since the beginning of the investigation to provide a complete and accurate picture of its situation.

The claim was therefore rejected and the provisional approach of establishing the export price on the basis of the sales price to this importer was maintained.

As to the fourth point, the claim was rejected because no grouping of different product types outside the scope of the product control numbers used to ensure a fair comparison had been carried out by the Commission.

In support of this claim they point to the lower prices of FA from Thailand, which are not alleged to be dumped, as well as to the lower normal value presented by the complainants prior to initiation of the proceeding.

The claim made by the exporter would suggest that normal values calculated in relation with constructed value were lower than actual prices in Taiwan but this was not the case, since the elements of the constructed value were based on actual prices.

This claim is based on the arguments that (i) the production costs are lower in Thailand; (ii) Thailand is the principal source of FA imported into the EU; and (iii) the complainants accept that there is no evidence that imports from Thailand are being made at dumped prices.

Imation's claim that the backward compatibility of the higher-capacity microdisk drives is further evidence of the two types of microdisk being a single product is therefore refuted; the higher-capacity microdisk component of the drive head is not backwardly compatible on its own.

As for the third point and with regard to the SG&A expenses, the claim was partly accepted and the Commission having received audited information concerning the most recent financial year which comprised the second half of the IP proceeded to a new calculation of these expenses incorporating the latest relevant information available.

Therefore, the claim was accepted.

For this reason alone, the claim could already be rejected.

This claim is based on the arguments that (i) the production costs are lower in Thailand;

As far as the first point is concerned, the claim was accepted and therefore the SG& A expenses regarding these costs were modified.

This claim was verified on the basis of the actual transport costs reported by the cooperating parties themselves.

a statement on the contention referred to in Article 59 (3) of the Basic Regulation on which the objection is based, and on particulars, items of evidence and arguments presented in support of the objection.

Imation's claim that the backward compatibility of the higher-capacity microdisk drives is further evidence of the two types of microdisk being a single product is therefore refuted;

This claim was accepted because it was shown that certain financing expenses did not concern operational activities related to the production and sales of the product concerned.

The claim was verified and it was indeed found that the US dollar had depreciated against the euro by 11,4 % between the original IP and the new IP.

This claim was rejected because the investigation revealed that the 3,5" microdisks manufactured by these two Community companies are produced mainly from components sourced in the Community.

The claim was rejected because no evidence was ever found that these two non-cooperating companies might have exported 3,5" microdisks to the Community during the investigation period or in other recent periods.

It has been argued that, in addition to the number of rings, 17- and 23-ring mechanisms have distinguishing physical characteristics, in particular higher base length and width, which make them more wear resistant than other mechanisms, and therefore significantly different.

As for the third point and with regard to the SG& A expenses, the claim was partly accepted and the Commission having received audited information concerning the most recent financial year which comprised the second half of the IP proceeded to a new calculation of these expenses incorporating the latest relevant information available.

(iv) a summary of the factors on which the allegation of injury is based;

Aged person is offended by the statement that he /she is slow and cautious.

Simple assertion, unsubstantiated by relevant evidence, cannot be considered sufficient to meet the requirements of this paragraph.

However, if the matter referred to arbitration includes a claim that the principles and procedures set forth in paragraph 3 have not been followed, the arbitrator shall examine that claim.

6 Such an imminent increase shall be a measurable one and shall not be determined to exist on the basis of allegation, conjecture or mere possibility arising, for example, from the existence of production capacity in the exporting Members.

In particular, the notice or report shall contain the information described in paragraph 4, as well as the reasons for the acceptance or rejection of relevant arguments or claims made by interested Members and by the exporters and importers.

In particular, the notice or report shall contain the information described in subparagraph 2.1, as well as the reasons for the acceptance or rejection of relevant arguments or claims made by the exporters and importers, and the basis for any decision made under subparagraph 10.2 of Article 6.

(1) With regard to the circumstances of a particular case, and by taking into consideration the justified interests of the advertiser, consumer and other parties to the action, the court or body overseeing the proceeding in relation to the advertisement, may demand proof from the advertiser of the truthfulness of the advertisement's claims in which alleged facts are indicated; and in comparative advertising the advertiser shall submit proof within a period which shall not exceed eight days.

Therefore, the claim was rejected.

The submission is therefore rejected.

The submission is therefore dismissed.

The argument is therefore rejected.

Why is this assertion possible?

Therefore, this argument had to be rejected.

Although apparently acceptable, such statements are in fact misleading.