Ureditev se mi zdi zelo posrečena, saj je lahko upravičenec z 'mnenjskimi' navedbami prizadet celo mnogo huje kakor z navajanjem golih dejstev - in povsem nepravično je, da bi zoper to imel od pravnih sredstev na voljo le kazensko in odškodninsko tožbo, saj je oboje lahko zelo drago, neučinkovito in včasih povsem neprimerno sredstvo, najprimernejše sredstvo (pravica do odgovora tam, kjer je bil napaden) pa mu ne bi bilo priznano.
I find the Slovene solution quite expedient, since opinions may hurt a person much more deeply than mere facts - therefore, it would be quite unjust if the only legal remedy available were criminal and civil (tort) lawsuits, which can be very costly, inefficient and sometimes quite inadequate, while the most adequate instrument (right to reply to an attack) would be denied.