Croatia improves the handling of domestic war crimes cases.

Croatia increases the capacity of the courts to handle cases adequately, including in terms of human resources and logistics.

The EU notes that two-thirds of corruption cases are dismissed by the Prosecutor and calls on Croatia to ensure increased transparency and control of such dismissals.

Such measures may include a requirement that individuals and businesses report the cross-border transfer of substantial quantities of cash and appropriate negotiable instruments.

The Union shall develop judicial cooperation in civil matters having cross-border implications, based on the principle of mutual recognition of judgments and decisions in extrajudicial cases.

In the case of multiple-use crops (food and non-food), their importance for food security should be the determinant for their inclusion in the Multilateral System and availability for facilitated access.

as an exception, to cross the state border outside border crossings or at border crossings outside working hours if this is absolutely necessary for the performance of mixed patrolling in a particular case;

In this context, the EU encourages Croatia to effectively deploy investigative resources to investigate the most serious and particularly sensitive cases and to make full, appropriate use of the possibility to transfer cases from local courts to the special war crimes chambers.

The EU also calls on Croatia to demonstrate an end to any bias in war crimes cases and ensure impartial handling of cases by the law enforcement bodies and courts, including through prioritisation of investigations and application of a uniform standard of criminal responsibility.

The EU invites Croatia to improve publication of and access to final court decisions both in the interests of the development of case law and consistent judicial practice, and in view of wider public dissemination.

3 In that respect, each Party shall adopt such legislative or other measures as may be necessary to detect the significant physical cross border transportation of cash and appropriate bearer negotiable instruments.

The EU calls on Croatia to increase the capacity of the courts to handle corruption and organised crime cases, including in terms of human resources and logistics, and to ensure the application of dissuasive sanctions.

1. The approval on the basis of Article 25 of the State Border Control Act (Ur. l. RS, No. 87/2002) in the case of the construction of works or changes in the intended purpose of use of works in the area of border crossings

d) to use official police vehicles during their cross-border activities, unless the police authority of the other Contracting Party does not permit this in a specific case, or if it imposes additional conditions for their use;

2) In cases where the river as referred to in Article 1 of this Protocol forms a border between two Parties, the vessels, persons and items in transit shall be exempted from all formal border-crossing procedures during the transit.

Croatia establishes a track record of implementation of the Anti-Discrimination Law and the Law on Hate Crimes, ensuring that law enforcement authorities deal effectively with cases and that the Office of the Ombudsman is strengthened.

in 6 patients bleeding was caused by ulcerative colitis, in 6 patients by angiodysplasia, in 6 patients the cause was colon cancer, in 5 patients rectal cancer, in 3 patients Crohn's disease and in 2 cases diverticula of the right colon.

Croatia makes progress with the physical infrastructure and computerisation of courts, the accelerated introduction of case management systems, in particular the Integrated Case Management System (ICMS), the establishment of a unified statistical system for the monitoring of all types of cases handled before all courts and at prosecution services, and introduces random case allocation in all courts;

(b) Feasible measures to detect or monitor the physical cross-border transportation of cash and bearer negotiable instruments, subject to strict safeguards to ensure proper use of information and without impeding in any way the freedom of capital movements.

In this context, the EU underlines the importance of Croatia establishing a track record of effective investigation, prosecution and court rulings in organised crime and corruption cases, regardless of level, including in vulnerable sectors such as public procurement.

The EU urges Croatia to proceed with caution when handling cases of apartments that have remained unoccupied and underlines that any reallocations should take place based on application of agreed clear and fair criteria, including close cooperation with UNHCR where appropriate.

Where the route referred to in the first subparagraph exceeds 500 km and in cases where the usual route includes a sea crossing, the staff member concerned shall be entitled, on production of the tickets, to reimbursement of the cost of travel by air in business class or equivalent.

The EU invites Croatia to continue its efforts to reduce substantially the case backlogs before all types of courts and to establish a single comprehensive system for statistical monitoring of case handling before all courts and State Attorneys' offices, ensuring inter alia that the average length of proceedings for different categories of cases can be adequately monitored.

Croatia establishes a track record of substantial results based on efficient, effective and unbiased investigation, prosecution and court rulings in organised crime and corruption cases at all levels including high level corruption, and in vulnerable sectors such as public procurement.

The Committee of the Regions shall be consulted by the European Parliament, by the Council or by the Commission where the Constitution so provides and in all other cases in which one of these institutions considers it appropriate, in particular those which concern cross-border cooperation.

Croatia establishes a track record of impartial handling of war crimes cases by the law enforcement bodies and courts and takes effective action to address issues of impunity, in particular by ensuring the proper investigation and prosecution of as yet un-investigated and un-prosecuted crimes, including adoption and implementation of a clear strategy which addresses, inter alia, regional discrepancies within Croatia, as well as continued engagement at the bilateral and regional level;

The EU calls on Croatia to take measures to tackle corruption in the private sector, to make full use of the possibility to prosecute legal persons for corruption, to prosecute cases of money laundering on a "stand-alone" basis and to pursue breaches of Article 300 of the Criminal Code (failure to report knowledge of criminal offences).

Croatia implements its action plan for the review of in absentia cases and the new provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code on renewal of proceedings and deploying other legal remedies such as protection of legality, ensuring renewal of proceedings requests and renewed trials are properly and impartially handled by all relevant judicial authorities.

(5) In order to be effective, the supplementary supervision of credit institutions, insurance undertakings and investment firms in a financial conglomerate should be applied to all such conglomerates, the cross-sectoral financial activities of which are significant, which is the case when certain thresholds are reached, no matter how they are structured.

Should the circumstances of the case impose the need for rescue units from one Contracting Party to cross the state border of the other Contracting Party, the rescue co-ordination centre in charge of co-ordinating the search and rescue operation shall request the rescue co-ordination centre of the other Contracting Party to grant permission for crossing the state border.

The EU calls on Croatia to ensure the efficient and effective handling of corruption and organised crime cases by USKOK, the police and the courts, including improved interagency cooperation, especially among law enforcement bodies and in the area of financial cooperation and data handling, and the establishment and implementation of memoranda of understanding and cooperation protocols.

Without prior announcement and in conformity with the Protocol concluded between the competent police authorities referred to in article 22 of this Agreement, official police vehicles may cross the territory of the other Contracting Party, with the aim of taking action in their own territory in cases in which the access to the part of the territory in question is not possible from their own country.

The EU also invites Croatia to implement its action plan for the review of in absentia cases, including implementation of the new provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code on renewal of proceedings and deploying other legal remedies such as protection of legality, thus ensuring that both the requests for the renewal of proceedings and any renewed trials are properly and impartially handled by all relevant judicial authorities.

? Bearing also in mind that that during the Adriatic-Ionian Conference, which took place in Ancona on May 19th 2000, two bilateral Agreements, one between Slovenia and Italy, and the other between Italy and Croatia, on the coordination in SAR operations were signed, both of them stating the common will to cooperate in the above mentioned matter and indicating procedures to be observed in case of SAR operations to be carried out;

Croatia, Italy and Slovenia, the three countries bordering the upper part of the Adriatic Sea, have been Contracting Parties to the Convention for the Protection of the Mediterranean Sea against Pollution (Barcelona Convention) and to its 2002 Protocol concerning Cooperation in Preventing Pollution from Ships and, in Cases of Emergency, Combating Pollution of the Mediterranean Sea (Prevention and Emergency Protocol) which replaced 1976 Protocol concerning Cooperation in Combating Pollution of the Mediterranean Sea by Oil and other Harmful Substances in Cases of Emergency (Emergency Protocol).

Subject to the provisions of Article 27, paragraph 4 of this Convention which relate to pedestrian crossings, the marking of part of the carriageway or of an area raised slightly above the level of the carriageway by parallel oblique stripes framed by a continuous line, or by broken lines, shall, in the case of areas framed by a continuous line, mean that vehicles must not enter that area, and in the case of areas framed by broken lines, that vehicles shall not enter that area unless it can be seen that it is safe to do so or in order to turn into a joining road on the opposite side of the carriageway.

Croatia substantially reduces the case backlog before the courts, particularly as regards old civil and criminal cases and enforcement decisions, and implements adequate legal and organisational measures to prevent undue delay in court cases, including the introduction of new methods of enforcement to ensure court decisions are enforceable within a reasonable time period, improved use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR), including the simplification of ADR mechanisms, and a track record of implementation of the new Criminal Procedure and Civil Procedure Codes;

Crocidolite, CAS No 12001-28-4 (1),

In the case of cross-holdings, the greater percentage applies.

In the case of combined crops the utilised agricultural area is allocated among the crops pro rata to the use of the ground by the crops concerned.

In these cases, growing crops are not considered to be stocks of work in progress.

In this case, as there is no data to check in the empty file, the cross-check is performed at once,

In such cases and if the Member States chooses to establish a base area for "arable crops other than maize":

It may well be appropriate in individual cases to consider cross-border credit transfers (or particular segments, such as retail cross-border credit transfers) as the relevant market.

In the case of combined crops, if one crop has no significance for the holding, it is ignored in the breakdown of the areas.

In certain cases it might be useful for the Member States to carry out administrative checks on cross compliance obligations.

concentration of asbestos fibres in the air at the place of work in the case of mixtures of crocidolite and other asbestos fibres:

In the case of cross compliance obligations reductions and exclusions may only be applied where the farmer acted negligently or intentionally.

in the case of blood products derived from animals belonging to the taxa Proboscidae and Artiodactyla, and their crossbreeds, other than ruminants: