Na podlagi teh razmislekov in ob upoštevanju dejstva, (a) da je obseg uvoza iz Kitajske občutno padel v obravnavanem obdobju (83 %), (b) da oznaka KN za zadevni izdelek vključuje tudi izdelke, ki niso vključeni v sedanjo preiskavo in zato ni nujno, da statistični podatki Eurostata o uvozu točno odslikavajo uvoz zadevnega izdelka iz Kitajske, (c) da je bil obseg uvoza, ki ga je navedel kitajski proizvajalec v svojem odgovoru na vprašalnik, pod pragom de minimis iz člena 5(7) osnovne uredbe in (d) da ni obstajal noben podatek, ki bi pokazal, da navedeni kitajski proizvajalec ne bi bil edini kitajski izdelovalec, ki bi prodajal zadevni izdelek za izvoz v Skupnost, je obveljalo, da bi bilo primerno upoštevati, da je bil tržni delež kitajskih izdelkov pod pragom de minimis.
Based on these considerations, and taking into account the fact (a) that the volume of imports from China has significantly decreased during the period considered (83 %), (b) that the CN code for the product concerned also includes products not covered by the present investigation and that therefore the Eurostat import statistics may not necessarily accurately reflect the imports of the product concerned from China, (c) that the volume of imports declared by the Chinese producer in its questionnaire response was below the de minimis threshold in Article 5(7) of the basic Regulation and (d) that there was no information to suggest that the above Chinese producer was not the only Chinese manufacturer to sell the product concerned for export to the Community, it was found appropriate to consider that the market share held by Chinese imports was below the de minimis threshold.